Keywords
tacit knowledge
personal knowledge
postpositivism
stratified universum
How to Cite
Abstract
Continuously from the 1940s, Michael Polanyi comments on topics that have resonated later since the 1960s in the works of his fellow theorists of science, philosophers of natural sciences, and epistemologists (for the purposes of this study, only T. S. Kuhn and K. R. Popper are mentioned). First part of this article provides a brief reconstruction of Polanyi’s concept of „personal knowledge“ which focuses mainly on the interconnection of the individual level of scientific research with its social dimension. My aim is to evaluate the potential of this concept for the interpretation of research fields where sciences are in close contact with other disciplines. I am convinced that Polanyi’s original approach to the problem of reality (or degrees of reality as he puts it) should be read as an advocacy of diversity of thought. In my interpretation, Polanyi carries out some form of philosophical therapy of science and its self-concept, which, like the whole of Western society, has undergone dramatic changes over the last century.References
Abram, David. Kouzlo smyslů: vnímání a jazyk ve více než lidském světě. Praha: DharmaGaia, 2013.
Bachelard, Gaston. Nový vědecký duch a další eseje. Praha: Malvern, 2018.
Benda, Libor. „Experti a laici v demokratické společnosti: tři pohledy na problematiku demokratizace vědy.“ Teorie vědy / Theory of Science 37, no. 1 (2015): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2015.283
Blum, Paul Richard. „Michael Polanyi: The Anthropology of Intellectual History.“ Studies in East European Thought 62, no. 2 (2010): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-010-9110-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-010-9110-2.
Broedbeck, May. Review of Social Change in Rural Society: A Textbook in Rural Sociology, by Everett M. Rogers, American Sociological Review 25, no. 4 (1960): 989. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090017">https://doi.org/10.2307/2090017.
Collins, Harry. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226113821.001.0001">https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226113821.001.0001.
Cordner, Colin. „Michael Polanyi and the Society of Explorers.“ Tradition and
Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical 45, no. 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5840/traddisc201945328">https://doi.org/10.5840/traddisc201945328.
Cvek, Boris. „Vědění jako nástroj: instrumentalizmus ve filozofii přírodních věd.“ Disertační práce, Univerzita Karlova, 2014.
Descartes, René. Meditationes de prima philosophia / Meditace o první filosofii. Praha: Oikoymenh, 2010.
Dolby, R. G. A. „The Authority of the Scientific Rejection of Pseudo-Science.“
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 9, no. 3 (1989): 283–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046768900900313">https://doi.org/10.1177/027046768900900313.
Dulles, Avery. „Faith, Church, and God: Insights from Michael Polanyi.“
Theological Studies 45, no. 3 (1984): 537–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056398404500306">https://doi.org/10.1177/004056398404500306.
Feyerabend, Paul K. Rozprava proti metodě. Praha: Aurora, 2001.
Galilei, Galileo. „The Assayer.“ In Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, edited by Stillman Drake. New York: Doubleday & Company, 1957.
Grene, Marjorie. Approaches to a Philosophical Biology. New York: Basic Books, 1968.
Grene, Marjorie. Knower and the Known. London: University of California Press, 1974.
Grene, Marjorie. Understanding Nature: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1974.
Grene, Marjorie. „Tacit Knowing: Grounds for a Revolution in Philosophy.“ Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 8, no. 3 (1977): 164–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1977.11006507">https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1977.11006507.
Grene, Marjorie. „The Language of Nature Reread.“ In Adolf Portmann: A Thinker of Self-Expressive Life, edited by Filip Jaroš and Jiří Klouda, 23–42. Dordrecht: Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67810-4_3">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67810-4_3.
Jacobs, Struan. „Michael Polanyi, Tacit Cognitive Relativist.“ The Heythrop
Journal 42, no. 4 (2001): 463–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2265.00174">https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2265.00174.
Jacobs, Struan. „Limits to Problem Solving in Science.“ International Studies in the
Philosophy of Science 15, no. 3 (2001): 231–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590120080172">https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590120080172.
Jacobs, Struan, and Phil Mullins. „Relations Between Karl Popper and Michael Polanyi.“ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42, no. 3 (2011): 426–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.09.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.09.001.
Jaroš, Filip. „Darwinismus a portmannismus: střetnutí nesouměřitelných biologických paradigmat?“ Teorie vědy / Theory of Science 32, no. 3 (2010): 301–18.
Klouda, Jiří. „Hermeneutický rozměr Portmannovy teoretické biologie.“ Reflexe 58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2020.23">https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2020.23.
Kuhn, Thomas S. Struktura vědeckých revolucí. Praha: Oikoymenh, 1997.
Lowney, Charles W. „Michael Polanyi: A Scientist Against Scientism.“ In Critics of Enlightenment Rationalism. Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism, edited by Gene Callahan and Kenneth B. McIntyre. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42599-9_10">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42599-9_10.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Fenomenologie vnímání. Praha: Oikoymenh, 2013.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Oko a duch. Praha: Obelisk, 1971.
Nye, Mary Jo. Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226610658.001.0001">https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226610658.001.0001.
Nye, Mary Jo, „Michael Polanyi: Science as Personal Knowledge and Social Practice.“ Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56, no. 13 (2017): 3426–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201610716">https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201610716.
Polanyi, Michael, and Marjorie Grene, ed. Knowing and Being: Essays by Michael Polanyi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
Polanyi, Michael, and Harry Prosch. Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226111612.001.0001">https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226111612.001.0001.
Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Polanyi, Michael. Science, Faith and Society: A Searching Examination of the Meaning and Nature of Scientific Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Polanyi, Michael. The Logic of Liberty. Rejections and Rejoinders. Indiana: Liberty Fund, 1998.
Polanyi, Michael. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
Popper, Karl R. Logika vědeckého zkoumání. Praha: Oikoymenh, 1997.
Portmann, Adolf. Animals as Social Beings. New York: Harper & Row, 1961.
Portmann, Adolf. „Nové cesty biologie I.“ Scientia & Philosophia 7 (1997): 51–161.
Ormerod, Owen. „Michael Polanyi and the Epistemology of Intelligence Analysis.“ Intelligence and National Security 36, no. 3 (2020): 377–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2020.1836828">https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2020.1836828.
Scott, William T. „A Course in Science and Religion Following the Ideas of Michael Polanyi.“ The Christian Scholar 47, no. 1 (1964): 36–46.
Scott, William T., and Martin X. Moleski. Michael Polanyi. Scientist and Philosopher. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Torrance, Thomas F. „Michael Polanyi and the Christian Faith.“ Tradition and Discovery 27, no. 2 (2000): 26–32.
Turner, Stephen. The Social Theory of Practices. Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions. Oxford: Polity Press, 1994.
Since 2019, TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE journal provides open access to its content under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors who publish in this journal agree that:
- Authors retain copyright and publication rights without restrictions and guarantee the journal the right of first publishing. All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows others to share this work under condition that its author and first publishing in this journal was acknowledged.
- Authors may enter into other agreements for non-exclusive dissemination of work in the version in which it was published in the journal (for example, publishing it in a book), but they have to acknowledge its first publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to make their work available online (for example, on their personal websites, social media accounts, and institutional repositories) as such a practice may lead to productive exchanges of views as well as earlier and higher citations of published work.
There are no author fees, no article processing charges, or submission charges.
The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
A summary of the open access policy is also available in the Sherpa Romeo database.