Renaissance Anatomy: The Path from Ars to Scientia with a Focus on Anatomical Works of Johannes Jessenius

Tomáš Nejeschleba

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2020.473

Abstract


Johannes Jessenius (1566–1621) became known by his contemporaries mostly as an exponent of the Italian anatomical Renaissance in Central Europe at the end of the sixteenth and at the beginning of the seventeenth century. The image of Jessenius in the twentieth century was also created with respect to his activities in the area of anatomy in Wittenberg and Prague in particular. The aim of this article is to put Jessenius into the context of the development of anatomy in the sixteenth century. An important point in this progression can be seen in the change of the definition of anatomy from the art (ars) of dis- secting bodies and a “method” of instructing students to the way of acquiring knowledge (scientiaa) of bodies and nature. The crucial role in this process played anatomical writings of the second half of the 16th century and the development seems to be connected with methodological discussions at the University of Padua. Jessenius, in his anatomical writings, primarily followed the Paduan anatomist Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564), whose work De humani corporis fabrica (1543) expresses the fundamental change in Renaissance anatomy. In addition, the methodological background of the anatomical Renaissance, which Jessenius became acquainted with during his studies in Padua, also echoes in Jessenius’ works.


Keywords


renaissance anatomy; Renaissance methodology; Johannes Jessenius

Full Text:

PDF

References


Celsus, A. Cornelius. De medicina (On Medicine) Volume I: Books 1–4. Translated by Walter George Spencer. Loeb Classical Library 292. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.celsus-medicine.1935.

Fabricius ab Aquapendente, Hieronymus. De visione, voce, auditu. Venetiis: Francesco Bolzetta, 1600.

Fallopio, Gabriele. “Expositio in librum Galeni de ossibus.” In Omnia Opera, 289–330. Venetiis: Apud Felicem Valgrisium, 1584.

Galen. “The Best Doctor is also a Philosopher.” In Galen: Selected Works, ed. Peter N. Singer, 30–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Jessenius, Johannes. Academiae Witebergensis studiosis, S. D. Witebergae: Seuberlich, 1601.

Jessenius, Johannes. Anatomiae, Pragae, anno MDC abs se solenniter administratae historia. Wittebergae: Laurentius Seuberlich, 1601.

Jessenius, Johannes. Et philosophiae et medicinae solidae studiosis. Witebergae: Typis M. Iohannis Cratonis, 1600.

Jessenius, Johannes. Institutiones chirurgicae. Wittebergae: Laurentius Seuberlich, 1601.

Jessenius, Johannes. Pro anatome sua actio. Ad spectandum invitatio. Witebergae: Typis Zachariae Lehmanni, 1600.

Jessenius, Johannes. Průběh pitvy jím slavnostně provedené v Praze L. P. MDC, k níž byl přičleněn Traktát o kostech. Trans. Bohdana Divišová, Hana Florianová, Cyril Matouš, Dana Svobodová, and Olga Vodenková. Praha: Karolinum, 2004.

Jessenius, Johannes. SEMEIOTIKE, Seu nova cognoscendi morbos methodus, Ad analyseos Capivvacinae normam, ab Aemylio Campolongo, professore Patavino, expressa. Wittebergae: Laurentius Seuberlich, 1601.

Ketham, Johannes de. The Fasciculus medicinae of Johannes de Ketham, Alemanus: Facsimile of the First (Venetian) Edition of 1491. Edited by Carl Sudhoff and Charles Singer. Trans. Luke Demaitre and Charles Singer. Birmingham, AL: Classics of Medicine Library, 1988.

Luzzi, Mondino de. Anatomia corporis humani. Leipzig: Martin Landsberg, 1493.

Vesalius, Andreas. Anatomicarum Gabrielis Fallopii observationum examen. Magni, humani corporis fabricae operis appendix. Ed. Johannes Jessenius. Hannoviae: Typis Wechelianis apud Claudium Marnium et haeredes Ioan. Aubrii, 1609.

Vesalius, Andreas. Andreae Vesalii Bruxellensis, scholae medicorum Patavinae professoris, de humani corporis fabrica libri septem. Basileae: ex officina Ioannis Oporini, 1543. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.109299.

Vesalius, Andreas. The Fabric of the Human Body: An Annotated Translation of the 1543 and 1555 Editions of “De humani corporis fabrica libri septem.” Trans. Daniel Garrison and Malcolm Hast. Basel: S. Karger, 2003.

Zabarella, Jacopo. On Methods. Volume 1: Books I–II. Ed. John P. McCaskey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.

Zabarella, Jacopo. On Methods. Volume 2: Books III–IV; On Regressus. Ed. John P. McCaskey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.

Borovanský, Ladislav. “Vzpomínka na Jessenia.” In Jan Jessenius z Jasené. Průběh pitvy jím slavnostně provedené v Praze L.P. MDC, k níž byl přičleněn Traktát o kostech, 11–27. Praha: Karolinum, 2004.

Carlino, Andrea. Books of the Body: Anatomical Ritual and Renaissance Learning. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999.

Cunningham, Andrew. The Anatomical Renaissance. The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients. Aldershot: Routledge, 1997.

De Saunders, J. B. C., and Charles D. O’Malley, eds. The Illustrations from the Works of Andreas Vesalius of Brussels. New York: Dover Publications, 1973.

Di Liscia, Daniel A., Eckhard Kessler, and Charlotte Methuen. Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997.

Di Maio, Salvatore, Federico Discepola, and Rolando F. Del Maestro. “Il Fasciculo di medicina of 1493: Medical Culture through the Eyes of the Artist.” Neurosurgery 58, no. 1 (2006): 187–96. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000192382.37787.80.

Favaro, Antonio. Atti della nazione germanica artista nello studio di Padova. Venezia, 1911.

Favaro, Giuseppe. Contributi alla biografia di Girolamo Fabrici d’Aquapendente. Padova, 1922.

French, Roger. Dissection and Vivisection in the European Renaissance. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999.

Gilbert, Neal W. Renaissance Concepts of Method. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.

Jardine, Nicholas. “Keeping Order in the School of Padua: Jacopo Zabarella and Francesco Piccolomini on the Offices of Philosophy.” In Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, eds. Daniel A. Di Liscia, Eckhard Kessler, and Charlotte Methuen, 183–209. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997.

Kachlik, David, David Vichnar, Dana Kachlikova, Vladimir Musil, Kristian Szabo, and Josef Stingl. “The Life and Work of Jan Jesensky (1566–1621), the Physician of a Dying Time.” Journal of Medical Biographyy 21, no. 3 (2013): 153–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967772013479736.

Kachlik, David, David Vichnar, Vladimir Musil, Dana Kachlikova, Kristian Szabo, and Josef Stingl. “A Biographical Sketch of Johannes Jessenius: 410th Anniversary of His Prague Dissection.” Clinical Anatomy 25, no. 2 (2012): 149–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21237.

Kaiser, Wolfram, and Anna Völker. Ars Medica Vitebergensis 1502–181777. Halle: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 1980.

Klestinec, Cynthia. Theaters of Anatomy. Students, Teachers, and Traditions of Dissection in Renaissance Venice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.

Lembke, Sven. “Wie der menschliche Leichnahm zu einem Buch der Natur ohne Druckfehler wird. Über den epistemologischen Wert anatomischer Sektionen im Zeitalter Vesals.” In Zergliederungen - Anatomie und Wahrnehmung in der frühen Neuzeit, ed. Albert Schirrmeister, 19–45. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2005.

Margócsy, Dániel, Mark Somos, and Stephen N. Joffe. The Fabrica of Andreas Vesalius. A Worldwide Descriptive Census, Ownership, and Annotations of the 1543 and 1555 Editions. Leiden: Brill, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004336308.

Mavrodi, Alexandra, and George Paraskevas. “Mondino de Luzzi: A Luminous Figure in the Darkness of the Middle Ages.” Croatian Medical Journall 55, no. 1 (2014): 50–53. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.50.

Mikkeli, Heikki. An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the Nature of Arts and Sciences. Helsinki: The Finnish Historical Society, 1992.

Nejeschleba, Tomáš. “Johannes Jessenius’s Conception of Method.” Acta Comeniana 20–21, no. 44–45 (2007): 9–23.

Nejeschleba, Tomáš. “Justification of Anatomical Practice in Jessenius’s Prague Anatomy.” Early Science and Medicine 21, no. 6 (2016): 557–74. https://doi.org/10.1163/15733823-00216p04.

Nutton, Vivian. “The Rise of Medical Humanism: Ferrara, 1464–1555.” Renaissance Studies 11, no. 1 (1997): 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-4658.1997.tb00008.x.

Nutton, Vivian. “Wittenberg Anatomy.” In Medicine and the Reformation, eds. Ole Peter Grell and Andrew Cunningham, 11–32. New York: Routledge, 1993.

Pick, Friedel. Johannes Jessenius de Magna Jessen. Arzt und Rektor in Wittenberg und Prag hingerichtet am 21. Juni 1621. Ein Lebensbild aus der Zeit des dreissigjährigen Krieges. Leipzig: Barth, 1926.

Randall, John Herman. “The Development of Scientific Method in the School of Padua.” Journal of the History of Ideas 1, no. 2 (1940): 177–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707332.

Ruttkay, László. “Jessenius als Professor in Wittenberg. Zum 350. Todesjahr von Jessenius.” Orvostorteneti kozlemenyek. Commutationes de historia artis medicinae 62–63 (1971): 13–55.

Sadler, Judy. “Ideologies of ‘Art’ and ‘Science’ in Medicine: The Transition from Medical Care to the Application of Technique in British Medical Profession.” In The Dymanics of Sciences and Technology: Social Values, Technical Norms and Scientific Criteria in the Development of Knowledge, eds. Wolfgang Krohn, Ewin J. Layton Jr., and Peter Weingart, 177–218. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1978.

Schütte, Jana Madlen. Medizin im Konflikt. Fakultäten, Märkte und Experten in Deutschen Universitätsstädten des 14. bis 16. Jahrhunderts. Leiden: Brill, 2017.

Šimon, František. “Úvod Jesseniových Institutiones chirurgicae.” In Historia medicinae slovaca I, Ján Jessenius (1566–1621) – Ľudia a doba. Mezinárodná vedecká konferencia konaná 8. decembra 2016, eds. Matěj Gogola and Lukáš Rybár, 37–45. Bratislava: Oddelenie histórie medicíny a zdravotníctva Ústavu sociálneho lekárstva a lekárskej etiky LF UK, 2017.

Siraisi, Nancy G. Avicenna in Renaissance Italy: The Canon and Medical Teaching in Italian Universities after 1500. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400858651.

Siraisi, Nancy G. Medieval & Early Renaissance Medicine: An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226761312.001.0001.

Stingl, Josef, and Vladimir Musil. “Struktura a obsah Jesseniovy knihy ‘Iohannis Jessenii a Iessen, Anatomiae, Pragae, anno M. D. C abs se solenniter administratae historia.’” In Ján Jessenius: Slováci na panovníckych dvoroch. Zborník prác z interdisciplinárnej konferencie, ktorá sa konala 13.–14. septembra 2011 v Martine, eds. Agáta Klimeková and Eva Augustínová, 11–21. Martin: Slovenská národná knižnica, 2012.




Copyright (c) 2020 Tomáš Nejeschleba

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE – journal for interdisciplinary studies of science is published twice a year by the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Centre for Science, Technology, and Society Studies). ISSN 1210-0250 (Print) ISSN 1804-6347 (Online) MK ČR E 18677 web: http://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz /// email: teorievedy@flu.cas.cz