Paul Lazarsfeld's Contributions to the History of Empirical Social Research
PDF

Supplementary Files

file with all information about author - not anonym

Keywords

Univerzita Sorbonne
Kolumbijská univerzita
Paul Lazarsfeld
Max Weber
Adolphe Quételet
Hermann Conring

How to Cite

Jeřábek, H. (2021). Paul Lazarsfeld’s Contributions to the History of Empirical Social Research. Teorie vědy Theory of Science, 43(2), 247-279. https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2021.508

Abstract

During the 1960s Paul F. Lazarsfeld, co-founder of the renowned Columbia school, worked to promote a useful new research methodology. This paper analyses these activities. In a series of papers, Lazarsfeld demonstrated that the roots of empirical research, the useful methodology he developed, lie in the work of early European scholars. Building on his belief that quantification does not need numbers, he showed that Hermann Conring, with his “classificatory statistics,” had predated Frédéric Le Play and his “ family budgets” and Adolphe Quételet and his “probability statistics” by almost two centuries. In another paper he highlighted the importance of Max Weber’s empirical studies on agrarian and industrial workers within the frame of his life work. His seminars at Columbia University with Robert K. Merton and at the Sorbonne with Raymond Boudon opened up transatlantic cooperation on empirical research between New York and Paris for decades to come.
PDF

References

Abrams, Philip. The Origins of British Sociology, 1834–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.

Barton, Allen. “Paul Lazarsfeld and the Invention of the University Institute for Applied Social Research.” In Organizing for Social Research, edited by Burkart Holzner and Jiri Nehnevajsa, 17–83. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publ. Co., 1982.

Bodard, Catherine. Frédérique Le Play. On Family, Work, and Social Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Boudon, Raymond. “La statistique psychologique de Tarde.” Annales internationales de criminologie 3 (1964): 1–16.

Boudon, Raymond. “Introduction.” In Paul F. Lazarsfeld: On Social Research and Its Language, edited by Raymond Boudon, 1–29. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

Calhoun, Craig, ed. Sociology in America. A History. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2007.

Clark, Terry N. “Empirical Social Research in France 1850–1914.” PhD. diss., Columbia University, 1967.

Clark, Terry N. “Emile Durkheim and the Institutionalization of Sociology in the French University System.” European Journal of Sociologyy 9, no. 1 (1968): 37–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600001636.

Clark, Terry N. “The Structure and Functions of a Research Institute: The Année Sociologique.” European Journal of Sociologyy 9, no.1 (1968): 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600001648.

Clark, Terry N. Gabriel Tarde on Communication and Social Influence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.

Clark, Terry N. “Émile Durkheim and the French University: The Intitutionalization of Sociology.” In The Establishment of Empirical Sociology in Continuity, Discontinuity and Institutionalization, edited by Anthony Oberschall, 152–86. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

Clark, Terry N. Prophets and Patrons: The French University System and the Emergence of the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674283428.

Cole, Stephen. “Continuity and Institutionalization in Science: A Case Study of Failure.” In The Establishment of Empirical Sociology in Continuity, Discontinuity and Institutionalization, edited by Anthony Oberschall, 73–129. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

Conring, Hermann. De origine iuris Germanici. Helmstedt: Mullerus, 1643.

Converse, Jean M. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence 1890–1960. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.

Desrosières, Alain, The Politics of Large Numbers. A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Donsbach, Wolfgang, Seymour Martin Lipset, Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, and Robert M. Worcester “Paul F. Lazarsfeld (1901–1976).” Journal for Public Opinion Research 13, no. 3 (2001): 225–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/13.3.225.

Gemeli, Giulianna. “Paul Lazarsfeld et la France au milieu des annés soixante.” In Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976), edited by Jacques Lautman and Bernard-Pierre Lécuyer, 465–97. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1998.

Goldfrank, Waiter. “Reappraising Le Play.” In The Establishment of Empirical Sociology in Continuity, Discontinuity and Institutionalization, edited by Anthony Oberschall, 130–51. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

Haas, Hannes, Hynek Jeřábek, and Thomas Petersen, eds. The Early Days of Survey Reseaerch and Their Importance Today. Wien: Braumüller, 2012.

Haas, Hannes, and Rudolf Richter. “Preface.” In Early Days of Survey Reseaerch and Their Importance Today, edited by Hannes Haas, Hynek Jeřábek, and Thomas Petersen, ix. Vienna: Braumüller, 2012.

Isambert, Francois-André. “Les recherches statistiques d’Ange-Michel Guerry (1802–1866).” Cahiers internationaux de sociologie 47 (1969): 35–44.

Jeřábek, Hynek. “Six Examples of Collaboration Between Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Robert K. Merton.” In The Early Days of Survey Reseaerch and Their Importance Today, edited by Hannes Haas, Hynek Jeřábek, and Thomas Petersen, 2–27. Vienna: Braumüller, 2012.

Jeřábek, Hynek. “Empirical Social Research, History of.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by James D. Wright, 558–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03217-7.

Jeřábek, Hynek. “How Empirical Social Research Gained Ascendancy in Post-War France.” Czech Sociological Review (forthcoming).

Jori, Alberto. Hermann Conring. Tübingen: MVK, 2007.

Landau, David, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. “Quetelet, Adolphe.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Bd. XIII., edited by David Sills, 247–57. New York: Collier-McMillan, 1968.

Lautman, Jacques, and Bernard-Pierre Lécuyer, eds. Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976) La sociologie de Vienne a New York. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1998.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F. “Notes on the History of Quantification in Sociology – Trends, Sources, and Problems.” In The Varied Sociology of Paul F. Lazarsfeld, edited by Patricia L. Kendall, 97–170, 360–63. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F. “Survey Analysis: The Analysis of Attribute Data.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Bd. 15, edited by David Sills, 419–29. New York: Collier-McMillan, 1968.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F. “An Episode in the History of Social Research: A Memoire.” In The Varied Sociology of Paul F. Lazarsfeld, edited by Patricia L. Kendall, 11–73, 351–60. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F. “Notes sur l’histoire de la quantification en sociologie: les sources, les tendances, les grands problemes.” In Lazarsfeld, Paul F. Philosophie des sciences sociales, edited by Raymond Boudon, 75–163. Paris: Gallimard, 1970.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F. “Foreword.” In The Establishment of Empirical Sociology in Continuity, Discontinuity and Institutionalization, edited by Anthony Oberschall, vi–xv. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F. “Toward a History of Empirical Sociology.” In Méthodologie de l’Histoire et des sciences humaines. Mélanges en l’Honneur de Fernand Braudel, edited by Edouard Privat, 289–301. Paris: Gallimard, 1973.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Anthony Oberschall. “Max Weber and Empirical Social Research.” American Sociological Review 30, no. 2 (1965): 185–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091563.

Lécuyer, Bernard-Pierre. Le recherche social empirique en France sous l’Ancient Régime. Paris: École practique des hautes études, 1963.

Lécuyer, Bernard-Pierre “Histoire et sociologie de la recherche social empirique.” Epistémologie sociologique 6 (1968): 119–31.

Lécuyer, Bernard-Pierre. “Un grande figure francophile de la sociologie empirique, quantitative et mathématique et de son étude historique: Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976).” Mathématiques et sciences humaines 40, no. 157 (2002): 49–104. https://doi.org/10.4000/msh.2865.

Lécuyer, Bernard-Pierre, and Anthony Oberschall “Social Research. The Early History of. Section III in article ‘Sociology.’” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by David Sills, 36–53. New York: Collier-McMillan, 1968.

Madge, John. The Origins of Scientific Sociology. New York: The Free Press, 1962.

Morrison, David. “Paul Lazarsfeld: Marginality, Migration and the Institutionalization of Research.” In The Early Days of Survey Research and Their Importance Today, edited by Hannes Haas, Hynek Jeřábek, and Thomas Petersen, 28–42. Vienna: Braumüller, 2012.

Neurath, Paul, M. “The Life and Work of Paul Lazarsfeld.” In Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976), edited by Jacques Lautman and Bernard-Pierre Lécuyer, 505–18. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1998.

Oberschall, Anthony. Empirical Social Research in Germany 1848–1914. Paris: Mouton & Co., 1965.

Oberschall, Anthony, ed. The Establishment of Empirical Sociology in Continuity, Discontinuity and Institutionalization. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

Oberschall, Anthony. “The Institutionalization of American Sociology.” In The Establishment of Empirical Sociology in Continuity, Discontinuity and Institutionalization, edited by Anthony Oberschall, 187–251. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

Oberschall, Anthony. “Paul F. Lazarsfeld and the History of Empirical Social Research.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 14 (1978): 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(197807)14:3<199::AID-JHBS2300140302>3.0.CO;2-H.

Petersen, Thomas. “The Art of Discovering Something Simple and New. The Role of Outsiders in the History of Social Research.” In The Early Days of Survey Research and Their Importance Today, edited by Hannes Haas, Hynek Jeřábek, and Thomas Petersen, 213–30. Vienna: Braumüller, 2012.

Platt, Jennifer. A History of Sociological Research Methods in America 1920–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Quételet, Adolphe. Physique sociale: Ou, essai sur le développement des facultés de l’homme. Brussels: Muquardt, 1869.

Quételet, Adolphe. A Treatise on Man and the Development of His Faculties. Edinburgh: Chambers, 1942.

Quételet, Adolphe. “Sur l’appréciation des documents statistiques, et en particulier sur l‘appréciation des moyennes.” Bulletin de la commission centrale de statistique 2 (1844): 205–86.

Quételet, Adolphe. Du systéme social et des lois qui le régisent. Paris: Guillaumin, 1848.

Quételet, Adolphe. Letters Addressed to H. R. H. the Grand Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, on the Theory of Probabilities, as Applied to the Moral and Political Sciences. London: C. & E. Layton, 1849.

Schad, Susan P. Empirical Social Research in Weimar Germany. Paris: Mouton & Co., 1972. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111558547.

Stigler, Stephen M. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.

Wikipedia, s. v. “Hermann Conring (Universalgelehrter),” last modified September 20, 2021, 12:35, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Conring_(Universalgelehrter).

Zeisel, Hans. “Toward a History of Sociography.” In Marienthal. The Sociography of an Unemployed Community, edited by Marie Jahoda, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and Hans Zeisel, 99–125. London: Tavistock, 1972.

Since 2019, TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE journal provides open access to its content under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Authors who publish in this journal agree that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and publication rights without restrictions and guarantee the journal the right of first publishing. All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows others to share this work under condition that its author and first publishing in this journal was acknowledged.
  2. Authors may enter into other agreements for non-exclusive dissemination of work in the version in which it was published in the journal (for example, publishing it in a book), but they have to acknowledge its first publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to make their work available online (for example, on their personal websites, social media accounts, and institutional repositories) as such a practice may lead to productive exchanges of views as well as earlier and higher citations of published work.

There are no author fees, no article processing charges, or submission charges.

The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.

A summary of the open access policy is also available in the Sherpa Romeo database.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.