Cantor’s Diagonal Proof
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2023.605
Abstract
Cantor's diagonal proof is significant both because the central method of proof used in it has been subsequently applied in a number of other proofs, and because it is considered to confirm the existence of infinite sets whose size fun damentally and by an order of magnitude exceeds the size of the "classical" infinite set represented by all natural numbers, while their size can theoretically exceed every conceivable limit. Although Cantor's proof is generally accepted by the scientific community, some experts are somewhat reserved about it. The aim of this paper is to present Cantor's proof in an accessible way, while pointing out its (hidden) assumptions and possible problematic points, and pointing out that some of its underlying assumptions are not indisputable mathematical truths, but rather postulated propositions that may or may not be accepted.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Čeština)References
Aristotelés. Metafyzika. Přel. Antonín Kříž. Praha: Rezek, 2003.
Aristotelés. Fyzika. Přel. Antonín Kříž. Praha: Rezek, 1996.
Bagaria, Joan. „Set Theory.“ In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 1997–. Article revised January 24, 2023.
Balcar, Bohuslav a Petr Štěpánek. Teorie množin. 2. vyd. Praha: Academia, 2000.
Bolzano, Bernard. Paradoxy nekonečna. Přel. Otakar Zich. Praha: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd, 1963.
Boolos, George S., John P. Burgess, and Richard C. Jeffrey. Computability and Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164931.
Cantor, Georg. „Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre I.“ Mathematische Annalen 46, no. 4 (1895): 481–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02124929.
Cantor, Georg. „Über eine Eigenschaft des Inbegriffes aller reellen algebraischen Zahlen.“ Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 77 (1874): 258–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1874.77.258.
Cantor, Georg. „Über eine elementare Frage der Mannigfaltigkeitslehre.“ Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 1 (1891): 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1874.77.258.
Cantor, Georg. Grundlagen einer Allgemenin Mannigfaltigkeitslehre. Ein mathematisch-philosophischer Versuch in der Lehre der Unendlichen. Leipzig: Teubner, 1883.
Cantor, Georg. „Zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre II.“ Mathematische Annalen 49, no. 2 (1897): 207–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01444205.
Dean, Walter. „Recursive Functions.“ In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 1997–. Article revised September 28, 2021.
Ferreirós, José. Labyrint of Thought. A History of Set Theory and Its Role in Modern Mathematics. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2007.
Frege, Gottlob. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: Wilhelm Koebner, 1884.
Frege, Gottlob. Wisseschaftliche Briefwechsel. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1976.
Gödel, Kurt. „Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der ‚Principia Mathematica‘ und verwandter Systeme.“ Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38 (1931): 173–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01700692.
Hilbert, David. „Über das Unendliche.“ Mathematische Annalen 95, no. 1 (1926): 161–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206605.
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature I. London: J. Noon, 1739.
Kolman, Vojtěch. „Continuum, Name and Paradox.“ Synthese 175 (2010): 351–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9527-7.
Kolman, Vojtěch. Filosofie čísla. Praha: Filosofia, 2008.
Kolman, Vojtěch a Vít Punčochář. Formy jazyka. Praha: Filosofia, 2015.
Lorenzen, Paul. „Aktuální nekonečno v matematice.“ In O špatném nekonečnu, editovali Vojtěch Kolman a Robert Roreitner, 397–405. Praha: Filosofia, 2013.
Peregrin, Jaroslav. „Diagonal Arguments.“ AUC Philosophica et Historica/Miscellanea Logica 2017, no. 2 (2017): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2017.14.
Poincaré, Henri. „Logika nekonečna.“ In O špatném nekonečnu, editovali Vojtěch Kolman a Robert Roreitner, 319–42. Praha: Filosofia, 2013.
Russell, Bertrand. „On Some Difficulties in the Theory of Transfinite.“ Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2–4, no. 1 (1907): 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-4.1.29.
Švejdar, Vítězslav. Logika, neúplnost, složitost a nutnost. Praha: Academia, 2002.
Tarski, Alfred. „Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprache.“ Studia Philosophica 1 (1935): 261–405.
Tarski, Alfred. „The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics.“ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (1944): 341–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968.
Therrien, Valérie L. „Wittgenstein and Labyrinth of ,Actual Infinity‘: The Critique of Transfinite Set Theory.“ Ithaque 10 (2012): 43–65.
Whitehead, Alfred N. and Bertrand Russell. Principia Mathematica. 3 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910, 1912, 1913.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Bemerkungen über die Grundlagen der Mathematik. London, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell and MIT Press, 1967.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Interactive Dynamic Presentation (IDP) of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Nachlass. Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. http://wittgensteinonline.no/.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophische Bemerkungen. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp, 1964.
Zich, Otakar. Úvod do filosofie matematiky. Praha: Jednota československých matematiků a fysiků, 1947.
Copyright (c) 2023 Marta Vlasáková
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE – journal for interdisciplinary studies of science is published twice a year by the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Centre for Science, Technology, and Society Studies). ISSN 1210-0250 (Print) ISSN 1804-6347 (Online) MK ČR E 18677 web: http://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz /// email: teorievedy@flu.cas.cz