A Perspective on Perspectivism
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2023.575
Abstract
Book review:
Smith, Kenneth. Perspectivism. A Contribution to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Routledge, 2022. 320 pages.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bachrach, Peter, and Morton Baratz. Power and Poverty. Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970.
Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu. “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11, no. 3 (2006): 211–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600923782.
Gallie, Walter B. Peirce and Pragmatism. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books, 1952.
Gallie, Walter B. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1956): 167–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167.
Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5.
Lundberg, George. Sociology. 4th edition. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.
Mannheim, Karl. Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Outhwaite, William. Concept Formation in Social Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.
Peirce, Charles S. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover, 1955.
Smith, Kenneth. “Mutually Contested Concepts and Their Standard General Use.” Journal of Classical Sociology 2, no. 3 (2002): 329–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X02002003197.
Copyright (c) 2023 William Outhwaite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE – journal for interdisciplinary studies of science is published twice a year by the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Centre for Science, Technology, and Society Studies). ISSN 1210-0250 (Print) ISSN 1804-6347 (Online) MK ČR E 18677 web: http://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz /// email: teorievedy@flu.cas.cz