Quentin Skinner’s Attempt to Clarify Collingwood
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2023.572
Abstract
This paper examines the methodological propositions of Quentin Skinner, whose influence on intellectual history, including the history and philosophy of science (HPS), cannot be disregarded. It is well known that Skinner’s method is based on John L. Austin’s theory of speech acts. Nonetheless, the very idea of applying ordinary language philosophy to the subject matter of history rests on other assumptions that form Skinner’s philosophy of historiography. The paper focuses on reconstructing this philosophy of historiography and especially on R. G. Collingwood as a primary source of inspiration. This famous British philosopher, historian, and archaeologist authored many inspirational texts concerning the historical craft. The complex and sometimes contradictory structure of his posthumously published texts requires careful interpretation, and many philosophers see Collingwood as an obscure thinker. The paper argues that even though Skinner openly denounces Collingwood’s central concept of re-enactment, his philosophy of historiography is deeply influenced by a specific understanding of Collingwood’s legacy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ankersmit, Frank. “The Dilemma of Contemporary Anglo-Saxon Philosophy of History.” History and Theory 25, no. 4 (1986): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505129.
Bevir, Mark, and Frank Ankersmit. “Exchanging Ideas.” Rethinking History 4, no. 3 (2000): 351–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/136425200457047.
Boucher, David. Texts in Context: Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas. The Music of Michael Nyman. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085821-3.
Collingwood, Robin G. An Autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939.
Collingwood, Robin G. The Idea of History. Edited by Jan van der Dussen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Collingwood, Robin G. The Principles of History. Edited by Jan van der Dussen and William H. Dray. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
D’Oro, Giuseppina. Collingwood and the Metaphysics of Experience. London and New York: Routledge, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203279007.
Dray, William H. History as Re-Enactment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Dussen, Jan van der. History as a Science: The Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4312-0.
Fear, Christopher. “‘Was He Right?’ R. G. Collingwood’s Rapprochement between Philosophy and History.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 11, no. 3 (2017): 408–24. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341382.
Goodhart, Michael. “Theory in Practice: Quentin Skinner’s Hobbes, Reconsidered.” The Review of Politics 62, no. 3 (2000): 531–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500041681.
Guéroult, Martial. “La Méthode En Histoire de La Philosophie.” Philosophiques 1, no. 1 (1974): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.7202/203001ar.
Hampsher-Monk, Iain, Karin Tilmans, and Frank van Vree, eds. History of Concepts: Comparative Perspectives. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053563069.
Koikkalainen, Petri, and Sami Syrjämäki. “Quentin Skinner on Encountering the Past.” Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 6, no. 1 (2002): 34–63. https://doi.org/10.7227/R.6.1.4.
Li, Hansong. “Ideas in Context: Conversation with Quentin Skinner.” Chicago Journal of History 2, no. 7 (2016): 119–28.
Mandelbaum, Maurice. The Anatomy of Historical Knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.68455.
McIntyre, Kenneth B. “Historicity as Methodology or Hermeneutics: Collingwood’s Influence on Skinner and Gadamer.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 2, no. 2 (2008): 138–66. https://doi.org/10.1163/187226308X315013.
Murphey, Murray G. Truth and History. New York: State University of New York Press, 2009.
Perdomi, Davide. “Melvin Richter’s Contribution to the Reception of Begriffsgeschichte and to Its ‘Contextualization.’” Journal of the Philosophy of History 10, no. 1 (2016): 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341316.
Reus-Smit, Christian. “Reading History through Constructivist Eyes.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37, no. 2 (2008): 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097647.
Richter, Melvin, and Hartmut Lehmann, eds. The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. Washington, D.C.: German Historical Institute, 1996.
Shapiro, Ian. “Realism in the Study of the History of Ideas.” History of Political Thought 3, no. 3 (1982): 535–78.
Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8, no. 1 (1969): 3–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/369249.
Skinner, Quentin. “Hermeneutics and the Role of History.” New Literary History 7, no. 1 (1975): 209–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/468286.
Skinner, Quentin. “The Rise of, Challenge to and Prospects for a Collingwoodian Approach to the History of Political Thought.” In The History of Political Thought in National Context, edited by Dario Castiglione and Iain Hampsher-Monk, 175–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521317.010.
Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics, Volume I: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics, Volume II: Renaissance Virtues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613777.
Skinner, Quentin. “The Place of History in Public Life.” In History & Policy. Institute of Historical Research, Senate House, University of London, 2002–. Article published November 8, 2005. https://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-place-of-history-in-public-life .
Tully, James, ed. Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215964.
White, Hayden. Tropics of Discourse Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
Copyright (c) 2023 David Černín
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE – journal for interdisciplinary studies of science is published twice a year by the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Centre for Science, Technology, and Society Studies). ISSN 1210-0250 (Print) ISSN 1804-6347 (Online) MK ČR E 18677 web: http://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz /// email: teorievedy@flu.cas.cz