Projectification and Conflicting Temporalities in Academic Knowledge Production
PDF (Czech)

Keywords

academic research
project time
process time
social acceleration

How to Cite

Ylijoki, O.-H. (2016). Projectification and Conflicting Temporalities in Academic Knowledge Production. Teorie vědy Theory of Science, 38(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2016.331

Abstract

Projectification and Conflicting Temporalities in Academic Knowledge Production

Abstract: The project format has become a standard and self-evident way to organize research work in today's accelerated university context, leading to the projectification of science. This paper argues that the project format is not a mere technical organizational tool, but that it challenges and reshapes research practices and ideals. The project format is embedded in a specific temporality which is called project time. The key characteristics of project time are scrutinized by distinguishing it from process time, which refers to the internal organizational logic of research. In addition, project time is examined through Barbara Adam's theorizing on the commodification, control, compression and colonization of clock time. In the last part of the paper, temporal conflicts in project-based research are examined empirically by drawing upon interview material with Finnish academics working in the social sciences.

Keywords: academic research; project time; process time; social acceleration

Projektifikace a konfliktní temporality v produkci akademického vědění

Abstrakt:Projektový formát se stává standardním a zcela zřejmým způsobem organizace vědecké práce v dnešním kontextu zrychlené univerzity a ústí v projektifickaci vědy. Tento článek tvrdí, že projektový formát není pouze organizačním nástrojem technické povahy, ale že zároveň postihuje a přetváří vědecké praktiky a ideály. Projektový formát je zakořeněný ve specifické temporalitě zvané projektový čas. Článek zkoumá hlavní rysy projektového času a odlišuje jej od procesuálního času (process time), který představuje vnitřní organizační časovou logiku výzkumu. Nadto je projektový čas analyzován pomocí teoretického modelu Barbary Adamové, ve kterém zkoumá komodifikaci, kontrolu, kompresi a kolonizaci hodinového času. Na pozadí rozhovorů s finskými sociálními vědci studie v závěrečné časti pojednává o časových konfliktech ve projektově orientovaném výzkumu.

Klíčová slova:akademický výzkum; projektový čas; procesuální čas; sociální zrychlení

PDF (Czech)

Since 2019, TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE journal provides open access to its content under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Authors who publish in this journal agree that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and publication rights without restrictions and guarantee the journal the right of first publishing. All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows others to share this work under condition that its author and first publishing in this journal was acknowledged.
  2. Authors may enter into other agreements for non-exclusive dissemination of work in the version in which it was published in the journal (for example, publishing it in a book), but they have to acknowledge its first publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to make their work available online (for example, on their personal websites, social media accounts, and institutional repositories) as such a practice may lead to productive exchanges of views as well as earlier and higher citations of published work.

There are no author fees, no article processing charges, or submission charges.

The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.

A summary of the open access policy is also available in the Sherpa Romeo database.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.